Irani belongs to which caste

In the same year she also produced 'Waaris'. After this in she appeared in a comedy show Maniben. Smriti produced the TV serial 'Virrudh'.

Also she portrayed the lead character of Vasudha in it. Later she produced Mere Apne. Vinod Khanna played important role in it.

She also acted in 'Teen Bahuraaniyaan. Smriti reached final round of the beauty pageant Miss India Other Leaders. By election: Results kindle hopes for Congress in string of Assembly polls next year. Panchkula Municipal Corporation election Notification Settings X Time Settings.

Clear My notification inbox. Clear Notification X Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox? Yes No. I challenge you to tell my caste. In her speech at the fag end of the adjournment motion moved by the Opposition to debate 'situation arising out of recent incidents in institutions of higher education with reference to JNU and Hyderabad universities,' Irani's impassioned intervention using her acumen of passion bordering on sensation, targeted the opposition, as she reeled out letter after letter from her files, written to her by Opposition benches seeking favours from her, right from seeking admissions in central schools to appointing someone in universities.

At one point, even the Speaker Sumitra Mahajan had a word of caution, reminding Irani that it was her job as a minister to act on MPs' requests. Over the past few days, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his ministers had for the first time, since assuming office approached the Opposition for the smooth conduct of the Budget session, in the wake of washout of the past two sessions consecutively, affecting the reforms agenda.

But the aggression and pugnacious attitude Irani displayed in the House has once again soured relations, raising clouds again on the functioning of Parliament, more particularly in the Rajya Sabha, where the Opposition has the majority. In this case, immigrants never returned to Iran.

This type of immigration could happen anywhere at any moment of history, so it cannot be said to be characteristic of this particular period. Unable to prosper in Safavid society, they moved to India without hesitation.

In this case, the immigrants could return to Iran, or at least keep in touch with their friends and relatives there Let us now examine the careers of two notables in this category. In the description of Isfahan by the French traveler Jean Chardin, there appears a blind prince who was incredibly good at mathematics.

He was a son of this Mirza Razi Thus Mir Mohammad Amin belonged to one of the most distinguished families in Safavid society at the time. No source tells us the real reason for this move. The sovereign of Golconda at that time recognized his talents and gave him an important position in state administration.

He finally became vakil regent. After the death of the king, however, he was dismissed by the new monarch and subsequently moved to the kingdom of Bijapur seeking another position. Unable to find an opening there, he returned to Iran autumn He expected a high post at the court, but the Shah, despite his kind welcome, did not offer him an interesting position, being only eager to cash in on the fortune Mir Mohammad had accumulated in India. After four years, Mir Mohammad gave up his post at the Safavid court with the intent of going to the Mughal court.

Jahangir rewarded him with 2 zats 32 and horses for his painstaking journey and his precious gifts He stayed at the Safavid court throughout the reign of Shah Safi , but received no special attention. After that, everything went his way. His high influence at the Mughal court is reflected in the fact that his name appears several times in European travel accounts, including those of Manucci, Bernier and Chardin The location of the mosque was significant, being built on the site of the Masjed-e Jorjir, which had been the second Friday mosque of the city during the Buyid period This was the very centre of the city, and no better location could have been chosen.

Much care was taken so that the labourers worked in good conditions. Not only were the workers provided for: it is said that feed was scattered along the road for the donkeys that carried the building materials The same kind of mobility can be shown in case of Persian poets who often held administrative posts at the Mughal court To the Persian speaking notables in Safavid society who knew all that was necessary for court life, it mattered little whether they served the Safavids or some other dynasty in India.

They emigrated easily to the east. Much more complete information will be gained as a result of studying other Mughal sources such as chronicles, tazkiras, documents and biographies. This however awaits further research and we must remain for the present content with the temporary results mentioned here.

Though providing only a general view, the paper does show clearly that the question of the emigration of Iranian elites to India cannot be overemphasized either for Indian or Iranian history. No person of Indian origin is known to have attained high position at the Safavid court. At the political and cultural levels, the stream of people flowed from west to east. On the other hand, a number of Indian merchants went to Iran in the seventeenth century.

Most caravanserais in good locations around the Royal Maydan in Isfahan were occupied by Indian merchants It is said there were more than ten thousand Indians in Isfahan and there existed even a crematory specially reserved for them on the shore of the Zayanda river in the latter half of the seventeenth century A number of Iranian people possessing sophisticated Persian culture emigrated from Iran to India seeking honour and fortune, while many Indian merchants moved from India to Iran looking for economic profit.

At least until the collapse of the Timurids at the beginning of the sixteenth century, Iran and Central Asia regularly had a common political and cultural background. People moved easily from one to the other. It is, however, generally believed that Iranian emigration to Central Asia after the rise of the Safavids was limited to those who were religiously persecuted. If so, the Mughal empire and the Uzbek regime might be thought to have had different attitudes towards immigrants.

This would not just be a question of the attitudes of the two states, for the view of the Iranian people towards the two countries should also be taken into account. What was the reason for this difference?

Why did Iranian people immigrate to India rather than to Central Asia? These questions remain unanswered. The actual situation of human interchange between Iran and Central Asia after the sixteenth century needs to be studied in order for these important questions to be clarified It is known that the Mughal dynasty came from Central Asia and there was an influential Turani group a group of people from Central Asia at its court. However, no serious study has yet been done on the movement of people between India and Central Asia, at least at the political and cultural level Much more work remains to be done.

Beveridge, revised, annotated and completed by B. Prashad, 2 vol. There is sometimes mention of more than two persons in the same item. That is why the number of items included in the English translation is different from the number of persons discussed in the present study.